
GRAVE ERROR:
Konstanty Gebert, a Jewish leader in Poland, left, and Michael
Schudrich, rabbi of Warsaw, center, after leaving the site where
the Polish authorities carried out exhumations of Jews massacred
by their Polish neighbors in 1941 in the northeastern town of
Jedwabne.
Pole Position
The
anniversary of the infamous Jedwabne Polish pogrom prompts debate,
soul searching
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
By
Ruth E. Gruber
/Jewish Telegraphic Agency
Jewsweek.com
| POLAND
-- Sixty years ago this week, half the people in a small town
in northeastern Poland brutalized the other half, torturing them
before herding them into a barn and setting it on fire. The horrific
events took place in the town of Jedwabne. The victims were Jedwabne’s
1,600 Jews. The perpetrators were their Polish Catholic neighbors.
This
week, the anniversary of the massacre, Poland’s president and
prime minister will join local officials, Jewish leaders and relatives
of the murdered Jews for a solemn ceremony to unveil a monument
at the site of the slaughter. Speakers include President Aleksander
Kwasniewski, who is expected to apologize for the massacre on
behalf of Poles, and the Israeli ambassador to Poland, Holocaust
survivor Shevach Weiss.
Rabbi
Jacob Baker, a representative of the victims’ families, will also
speak and lead prayers. New York cantor Joseph Malovany will chant
Kaddish. The official ceremony was preceded by a commemoration
in the synagogue in Warsaw last Friday—the 15th of Tammuz, which
was the anniversary of the slaughter according to the Jewish calendar.
Jewish leaders said the commemoration was a "complement,
not a competition" to the official event. They expressed
gratitude to Kwasniewski and other government leaders, despite
lingering controversy over the wording on the monument, which
does not firmly place the blame for the massacre on local Poles.
SPARKED
DEBATE
The
ceremonies are the culmination of months of lacerating debate
in Poland about both the Jedwabne massacre and its implications.
The debates, carried out in the media, churches, public meetings,
conferences and other forums, were sparked by the publication
last year of "Neighbors," a book about the massacre
by Polish-born New York University professor Jan Gross.
The
often emotional, even painful, exchanges were the most open and
in-depth exploration yet into Poland’s role and responsibility
in the Holocaust. They could be compared to the postwar debates
in Germany over collective guilt for the Holocaust.
But,
says historian Marta Petrusewicz, the Polish debates, coming after
decades of ignorance or denial, are even more complex. "The
debate in Germany was forced on the Germans as part of the whole
program of de-Nazification," said Petrusewicz, a Warsaw-born
Jew who left Poland during the Communist regime’s anti-Semitic
purges in 1968. "In a way, though horrible, this is a simpler
debate than others," she said. "In other countries,
such as France, such examinations came later, in the 1980s. There
was a refusal for years to face it."
In
Poland, she said, "the debate is the most complicated of
all. It touches on the myth of Polish innocence. This myth is
extremely deep among Poles -- even in self-critical people."
|
the debate is the most complicated of all. It touches
on the myth of Polish innocence ...
--Marta
Petrusewicz
|
| |
|
Poles
suffered deeply under the Nazis. The ideal of Polish resistance
and heroism was bolstered under communism. "Polish sins,
our disgraceful deeds and shameful historical events were fully
covered up to prevent conflicts with the official version of history,"
said a recent editorial in a Polish newspaper. "Children
were brought up on tales of Polish splendor and heroism, tolerance,
and undeserved misfortune plaguing our nation since its founding.
"An
average person learned to attach emotionally to the history and
affirm it," the editorial said. "In 1990 censorship
disappeared, yet the frame of mind which resulted from 60 years
of constant brainwashing turned out to be much more difficult
to modify than political and economic institutions.
"The
identity is shaped by generations, and only profound education
or communal catharsis can reframe its illusionary content. The
truth about Jedwabne could catalyze such a purifying process,
yet it’s hard to determine whether Poland is ready for the total
reshaping of its identity."
'GUILT
BY NEGLECT'
Indeed,
Poles in general did not and do not suffer the guilt of Germans
as perpetrators of the Holocaust; if anything, they suffer another
kind of guilt, a guilt one Polish writer has called "guilt
by neglect." This entailed the guilt of having been bystanders
-- victims of the Nazis themselves but at the same time witnesses,
often indifferent or even complacent to genocide.
Communist-era
taboos prevented an objective public analysis of the Holocaust,
Jewish issues and history itself -- and even dissident historians
sometimes shied away from these issues.
Much
of the material on Jedwabne that Gross consulted for his book
-- including research carried out by the Jewish Historical Institute
-- had been published or was otherwise easily available. But,
noted Petrusewicz, it lay untouched by scholars. "Not even
important dissident historians, including Jews, looked into these
openly accessible archives," she said. "It is mind-blowing.
There is no objective justification for it. There was an enormous
block that made all of us totally blind."
This
isn’t the first time the issue of Poland’s role and responsibility
in the Shoah has been aired in Poland. But it marks the first
time such themes are being touched in a Poland that has a functioning
democracy, market economy and free press. For example, Claude
Lanzmann’s epic film "Shoah" sparked unprecedented discussion
and generally outraged reaction after parts of it were shown on
Polish television in the mid-1980s. Lanzmann himself accused Poles
of involvement in the Holocaust, prompting an official protest
from Poland’s Communist government.
In
1987, a Krakow scholar published an article in a liberal Catholic
weekly saying Poles should feel some complicity in the Holocaust,
if only because of their indifference. This touched off an exchange
of articles that British scholar Antony Polonsky described as
"the most profound discussion since 1945 of the Holocaust
in Poland and, above all, of the vexed question of the Polish
response to the mass murder of the Jews."
It
was the first time these highly-charged issues, incorporating
a full range of philo- and anti-Semitic views and rival visions
of Poland and its past, were aired in a public, if still limited,
forum.
The
Jedwabne debates have included hundreds of published articles,
broadcasts, round-table discussions, sermons and letters to the
editor. There are several Web sites devoted to the issue, including
www.pogranicze.sejny.pl/english/jedwabne,
which lists dozens of articles in English.
Few
believe the official ceremony will put an end to the discussion
or the difficult process of coming to terms with the past. "It’s
a good thing it is happening, but it’s not the end of the story
by any means -- nor should it be," said Petrusewicz.
***
{©
Jewish Telegraphic Agency Inc. The above information is available
on a read-only basis and cannot be reproduced without permission
from JTA.}
(c)
2001 Jewsweek.com
|